freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage

From: liam AT inodes.org
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:33:44 +1000

On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:00:28AM +0200, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:

> Applied, only small changes made.

Thanks!

> Why do you boost thread loop count from 100 to 1000 ?

To increase the probability of encountering intermittent concurrency problems
by executing an increased number of iterations.

Cheers.

Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage , (continued)
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/08/2005
  - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
    - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Peter Deacon, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/15/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
  - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005