freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT schemamania.org>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:26:15 -0500
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT schemamania.org> wrote:
> OK, except #2. I didn't include the patch because I think it would be
> too unreliable. I'm not sure how consistent libtool will be from Mac to
> Mac. That's why I only documented it in the UG. Also, I hope the
> problem will just Go Away sometime soon, so I didn't want to add a
> libtool patch to our CVS.
OTOH, if a Mac user would like to upload a patch to the Source Forge
patches, that would be a fine place to maintain such a thing. The user
guide could direct folks there to download it, which would be more
reliable than cutting and pasting from the UG or editing libtool by hand.
Although hand edits are all anyone's done to date.
--jkl
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1
, (continued)
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
John Gilmore-Baldwin, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, John Gilmore-Baldwin, 12/28/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, Daniel Fazekas, 12/29/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
- RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
- RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.