freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: John Gilmore-Baldwin <jbaldwin AT theolympian.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:31:24 -0800
FWIW, gethostbyname() is threadsafe on Mac OS X 10.2 and later.
<http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2053.html>
I do have ODBC installed because OS X installs it for you. But I have done zero setup on it. I have no idea how you account for that. Apple's done almost no documentation on it. (And "almost" is being generous, unless I'm mistaken.)
Here's a snippet from the configure output (with thread safety enabled):
checking threadsafety... enabled
checking for which type of gethostbyname_r... no
checking for which type of getservbyname_r... no
checking for which type of gethostbyaddr_r... no
checking for which type of getpwuid_r... five
checking for which type of localtime_r... struct
Hope this is of some help. Sorry I'm not doing more analysis myself. I'll poke at it as I can.
John
On Dec 27, 2003, at 3:21 PM, James K. Lowden wrote:
The threadsafe and odbc options are supposed to be autodetecting. We seek
out functions and test them in the configure script, and, if they work, we
compile against them. I guess the threadsafe test finds threadsafe
functions, but we don't use them correctly (or something). And I thought
we were done. ;-)
Is it the case that you have ODBC installed but not set up (because you
don't use it)?
I should probably make that clearer in the UG.
-
[freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/26/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
John Gilmore-Baldwin, 12/27/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, John Gilmore-Baldwin, 12/28/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/27/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, Daniel Fazekas, 12/29/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
- Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
James K. Lowden, 12/29/2003
- RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
- RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/29/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc1,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/27/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.