freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>
- To: "'FreeTDS Development Group'" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:09:56 -0500
> From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
> Sent: February 24, 2003 4:15 PM
>
> Il lun, 2003-02-24 alle 21:46, Craig Davison ha scritto:
> >
> > Maybe the docs should be bundled with the -devel package then. :)
>
> IMHO this discussion apply to 0.62 version...
Yes, absolutely. :-)
> You can use documentation for configure server and for developing
> another application... If you have a system administrator and a
> developer developer should use all packages (i386, devel and
> doc) while
> sa should use 2 package (i386 and doc) but if you have 2 machine and
> only one person it will install all package in
> developement/test machine and only i386 on other...
I think we're down to one question: whether or not to have a separate doc
rpm, and/or in which rpm the UG should be included. From your description,
it seems freetds-0.61-1.i386.rpm is required for everything. That makes it
seem like the likely candidate for included documentation.
My premise was that "make install" would be changed to install the UG.
Let's see if we can get that far, and agree on where it should go (and in
how many formats), and then see if we've made your RPM scheme easier or
harder or better or worse.
Thank you for being Mr. RPM, Freddy. Clearly, people care about it.
--jkl
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or
instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying
out such orders and/or instructions.
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced
, (continued)
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Lowden, James K, 02/24/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
David Owen, 02/24/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Frediano Ziglio, 02/24/2003
-
Re: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Craig Davison, 02/24/2003
- Re: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Frediano Ziglio, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, David Owen, 02/24/2003
-
Re: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Craig Davison, 02/24/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Frediano Ziglio, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Brian Bruns, 02/24/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
David Owen, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Lowden, James K, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Lowden, James K, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, ZIGLIO Frediano, 02/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Lowden, James K, 02/24/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 02/25/2003
- Re: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced, Alf-Ivar Holm, 02/26/2003
-
RE: [freetds] 0.61rc4 posted and announced,
Lowden, James K, 02/24/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.