freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Geoff Winkless" <geoff AT farmline.com>
- To: "TDS Development Group" <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: SQL Server Emulation
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:26:48 +0100
"Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com> wrote:
: Of course, if you build a layer in your system and call it a "middle tier"
: that provides data services to the application and speaks SQL to the
server,
: you can say your application is portable. But that "middle tier" just
: isn't, stored procedures or no.
What??? A true "middle tier" means that neither side cares (or knows!) about
the structures or communications layer used by the other side. As such, if
you change the database, the majority of the code will not need to be
changed, merely the middle tier.
A well written middle tier should be reasonably portable. A middle tier that
relies on implementation-specific SQL will (of course) present the same
problems.
Geoff
-
Re: SQL Server Emulation
, (continued)
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Geoff Winkless, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Rui Ribeiro, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Geoff Winkless, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Michael Peppler, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Norman Palardy, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Norman Palardy, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Lowden, James K, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Lowden, James K, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Steve Langasek, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Norman Palardy, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Geoff Winkless, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, James Cameron, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, James K. Lowden, 06/20/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Mark H. Wood, 06/21/2001
- Re: SQL Server Emulation, Brian Bruns, 06/26/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.