corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: tmcos AT canada.com
- To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Jeff Peterson wrote:
Joel Marcus's article that was referred to earlier in
this post is quite a good piece and makes a strong case
that the ANQRWPOS in the expression would have
been recognized as a reference to Adam, called hO
ANQRWPOS in Gen 1-3 LXX.
I can see ANQRWPOS having a reference to Adam in LXX
Gen 1-3 (and also the passages in Ezekiel), however the
"son of man" used in Mark 14:62 is the apocalyptic son
of man of Daniel 7:13 and a divine figure. I think at
this point and context it differs from the idea of a
plain human being like Adam.
Tony Costa
-
[Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man,
Richard H. Anderson, 12/08/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, Anthony Buglass, 12/13/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, tmcos, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man,
Jim West, 12/08/2003
- [Corpus-Paul] Re: son of man, jucci, 12/08/2003
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man,
Given, Mark Douglas, 12/13/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, Anthony Buglass, 12/14/2003
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, Jeff Peterson, 12/13/2003
- [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, tmcos, 12/14/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, Jeff Peterson, 12/14/2003
-
[Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man,
tmcos, 12/14/2003
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, David C. Hindley, 12/14/2003
-
[Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man,
tmcos, 12/14/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] RE: son of man, Steve Black, 12/14/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.