corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?
- From: Steve Black <sdblack AT telus.net>
- To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 08:27:29 -0700
Dave Wrote...understood completely...
Since it really requires a familiarity with the other Paulines to be
Dave, why do you think that Hebrews would only make sense if one had some "familiarity with the other Paulines"? I haven't thought this in the past - am I missing something?
On a related - but also unrelated note - Usually Hebrews is dated late-ish - but I have wondered at the lack of mention of the destruction of the temple in it. As I follow the argument as presented by its author - it seems like it would have been a powerful means to further his/hers aims in the letter. More so than any where else in the NT - as I see it. His flow of "logic" "calls out" for an explicit mention of the temple - and because this is not to be found - it makes me wonder if the temple had not yet been destroyed when it was written - making it earlier than usually thought.
--
Steve Black
Vancouver School of Theology
Vancouver, BC
---
The lion and the calf shall lie down together
but the calf won't get much sleep.
-Woody Allen
-
[Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
David ATTBI, 05/03/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, Steve Black, 05/03/2003
-
[Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
David C. Hindley, 05/04/2003
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
Steve Black, 05/04/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, stephen.finlan, 05/04/2003
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
David C. Hindley, 05/10/2003
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
Steve Black, 05/10/2003
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, David C. Hindley, 05/16/2003
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
Edgar M. Krentz, 05/10/2003
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, Steve Black, 05/11/2003
-
RE: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
Steve Black, 05/10/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, Frank W. Hughes, 05/04/2003
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?,
Steve Black, 05/04/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, Charles Savelle, 05/04/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, Jim West, 05/04/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Why was Hebrews ever thought to be by Paul?, David Inglis, 05/04/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.