corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "David Inglis" <david AT colonialcommerce.com>
- To: corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Jerusalem conference
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:13:06 -0400
Bob MacDonald wrote:
>
> Bob: I don't see any connection between Galatians 2:11 and the Jerusalem
> council of Acts 15.
> If the council had sent the letter from the apostles (Acts 15:23-29), I
> think Paul would have appealed to it in Galatians. This is too long a topic
> for the current window.
This has for a long time seemed to me to be a very important point, one
that appears to get overlooked. Acts 15:23-29 gives us the text of "the
decrees that had been decided on by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem
for the Gentile believers" (Acts 16:4) that were then delivered by Paul
and Silas to "every town where we proclaimed the word of the Lord" (Acts
15:36). Therefore, IMHO the best explanation for Paul not mentioning
these decrees in Galatians is simply that Galatians pre-dates the decrees!
Any more complicated explanation is, I believe, unnecessary.
Dave Inglis
david AT colonialcommerce.com
3538 O'Connor Drive
Lafayette, CA, USA
-
Fw: RE: Jerusalem conference
, (continued)
- Fw: RE: Jerusalem conference, Eric Zuesse, 08/26/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Bob MacDonald, 08/27/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Bob MacDonald, 08/28/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Hyam Maccoby, 08/28/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Eric Zuesse, 08/28/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Eric Zuesse, 08/28/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Vince Endris, 08/28/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Bob MacDonald, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Hyam Maccoby, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, RSBrenchley, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, David Inglis, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Steve Black, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Edgar M. Krentz, 08/30/2002
- Re: Jerusalem conference, Bob MacDonald, 08/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.