corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Kym Smith" <khs AT picknowl.com.au>
- To: corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: The "We" sections in Acts.
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:40 -0400
Dear Steve,
I am sorry but I cannot help you get to the resources you seek. However,
and without wishing to unnecessarily ruffle any feathers, from your first
post I was interested in your comment:
<<< It is easy for me to believe that people remember their own histories
through their ideological lens, filtering out those things that might
threaten their "construct".>>>
It seems to me to be doubly hard to get to an accurate idea about the
events recorded because we read their histories through *our* ideological
lenses, filtering out those things that might threaten *our* "constructs"
I note in your second post that you say of Paul (and it may equally be
said of Luke) that:
<<<He does however have the benefit of being a lot closer to the events, and
is a much firmer candidate for eyewitness status, which does gain him some
brownie points...>>>
Just an observation!
Sincerely,
Kym Smith
Adelaide
South Australia
khs AT picknowl.com.au
-
The "We" sections in Acts.,
Steve Black, 08/13/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The "We" sections in Acts., Perry L Stepp, 08/13/2002
- Re: The "We" sections in Acts., Steve Black, 08/13/2002
- Re: The "We" sections in Acts., Kym Smith, 08/14/2002
- Re: The "We" sections in Acts., Peter Kirby, 08/14/2002
- Re: The "We" sections in Acts., Perry L Stepp, 08/14/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.