corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Jeff Peterson <peterson AT mail.ics.edu>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Pseudonymity
- Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 13:55:04 -0700
At 6:05 PM -0300 4/30/99, Frank W. Hughes wrote:
>The classic problem of 2 Thessalonians, as reflected by the publication of
>William Wrede's Die Aechtheit des 2. Thessalonicherbriefes untersucht in
>1903, was how you can take seriously the literary closeness of 1 and 2
>Thessalonians, which Wrede showed primarily by way of a synopsis in
>parallel columns.
Just curious: is it Wrede's book that should be credited with establishing
pseudonymous authorship of 2 Thess as scholarly orthodoxy? I've operated on
this assumption but would appreciate having it dis/confirmed by someone
who's worked through the literature as thoroughly as Frank.
Jeff
------------------------------------
Jeffrey Peterson
Institute for Christian Studies
Austin, Texas, USA
------------------------------------
-
Pseudonymity,
Patrick Nugent, 05/01/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Pseudonymity, Jeff Peterson, 05/03/1999
- Re: Pseudonymity, Frank W. Hughes, 05/03/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.