cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work
List archive
- From: "Firas D." <fd AT firasd.org>
- To: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work <cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: rel="license"
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:45:52 -0500
Kevin Marks wrote:
Tantek just put together a formal spec for this:
http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/RelLicense
comments and improvements welcome.
Isn't this reinventing the 'copyright' value of rel? http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links
Also, if I read the normative XMDP correctly, what's going on here is that a new 'link type' is being defined--hence, it is usable on the <link> element too, not just hyperlinks? Putting document properties in an <a> element is just weird; I'm going to pull it out of the <a> element in my WordPress CC tool and put a <link rel="license"> in <head>.
-
rel="license",
Kevin Marks, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Kevin Marks, 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Kevin Marks, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
snowchyld, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Sylvain ZIMMER, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Andy Powell, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
snowchyld, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
- Re: rel="license", Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Lucas Gonze, 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
-
Re: rel="license",
Firas D., 02/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.