discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work

[Ben Hammersley <ben AT benhammersley.com>]

On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 11:06 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
> However, regardless of personal view of this, you're pushing a form of
> dc:creator that now differs from the documentation that exists at 
> Dublin
> Core _in published form_ and that exists in many many many 
> applications,
> including every use of RSS actively supported (RSS 1.0 and 2.0), most
> weblogging uses, and I bet several other applications. Just something 
> to
> note.

ARRRRRGHHHHHHH

Right. Here's the thing. Simple question for Aaron and Lisa, and I want 
a simple yes/no answer. If the word 'huh' appears in any answer, I 
swear to god someone is going to get beaten.

And the question is thus:

Is the RDF representation of the CCL still valid with a string literal 
form of <dc:creator> ?