Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 translation worksheet discrepancies

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Kat Walsh <kat AT creativecommons.org>
  • To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 translation worksheet discrepancies
  • Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:36:03 -0700

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Tarmo Toikkanen
<tarmo.toikkanen AT aalto.fi> wrote:
> On creating the xhtml version of the 4.0 suite translation, I've stumbled
> onto the following discrepancies between the html text currently in the CC
> BY-NC-SA 4.0 legal code html file and the translation worksheet:
>
> 1. Section "Considerations for the public", last sentence is "More
> considerations for the public" in the legal code, while in the worksheet the
> sentence is "More considerations for licensees". Which is correct?

This is an error in the worksheet. "More considerations for the
public" is the correct language.

> 2. The worksheet is missing the H1 title "Creative Commons Legal Code".
> Should it be translated?
>
> 3. The worksheet is missing the H3 title "Creative Commons
> Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License"
> (although in most cases it's probably easy to build from the license
> components).

Thanks; we'll add these to the worksheet also.

> 4. The worksheet is missing the "Additional languages available" bit, which
> is in html <!-- comments currently. Should it be translated or not? If yes,
> can we also fix the html invalidity problem, as the commented section
> contains a <p> that is not closed? The section also contains an "<a name"
> attribute, which is currently obsolete. What is your advise?

It should be translated; we'll add this also. (It is currently
commented-out in the English because it makes no sense to display it
when there aren't any translations published yet.) Please do fix this
in your final draft, including replacing the obsolete element; we'll
add the corrections to the English also.

>
> 5. "Back to Commons Deed" is in the html, but not in the worksheet. Should
> it be translated?

Yes, it should be. (The worksheet is mainly to aid our reviewing, and
since this is just navigational text we're not particular about how
this is translated--but since it is confusing that it is not present,
we will add it.)

Thanks,
Kat

--
Kat Walsh, Counsel, Creative Commons
IM/IRC/@/etc: mindspillage * phone: please email first
Help us support the commons: https://creativecommons.net/donate/
California Registered In-House Counsel #801759
CC does not and cannot give legal advice. If you need legal advice,
please consult your attorney.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page