cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
- From: Anthony <ok AT theendput.com>
- To: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de>, Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 18:51:19 -0400
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014, 18:37:06 schrieb Anthony:
> I know I'm responding to a long post with a short one-sentence response,That’s completely OK ☺
> but I just don't get this part.
Because that allows others to add changes under the *easier* license and make it impossible for me to integrate these changes.
> Why can't you just dual license?
But...doesn't one-way compatibility do the same thing?
My personal rule for licensing is: I want others to be able to use my works as long as I can combine all future versions of my creations with all my other creations.
So you want two-way compatibility. Otherwise someone can use your work, release the derivative under GPL, and you can't merge the changes in with the CC-BY-SA version of the work.
Since some of my creations *require* GPL to fullfill this requirement, I cannot release my works under non-GPL-compatible licenses.
Changing the license of art to GPL makes reuse less convenient, but sharealike is preserved.
Changing the license of a program to BY-SA effectively kills sharealike.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Luis Villa, 05/03/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/04/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Richard Fontana, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Paul Norman, 05/06/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Anthony, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/10/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Richard Fontana, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Rob Myers, 05/06/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Gisle Hannemyr, 05/18/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/07/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.