cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
- From: Anthony <ok AT theendput.com>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 18:41:34 -0400
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de> wrote:
> Should CC just deprecate BY-SA and declare the GPL to be version 5?>It should not: The GPL brings huge practical hassles for stuff like multitrack recordings and graphical art. If you run a project which needs the GPL to have real copyleft, then you already have most of the infrastructure for dealing with that (versioned dependencies, build systems, asset-repositories and so forth), but if you do not, then releasing under the GPL requires quite some effort.
> If not, why not? Which of the objectives for compatibility would not be
> achieved by this?
What specifically are the problems with applying the GPL to graphical art?
How will these problems be solved by someone who wants to incorporate CC-BY-SA graphical art in a GPL work?
Versioned dependencies, build systems, asset-repositories....do these apply to graphical art?
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Paul Norman, 05/06/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Anthony, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/10/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/07/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Arne Babenhauserheide, 05/09/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility, Gisle Hannemyr, 05/18/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #3: one-way compatibility,
Anthony, 05/07/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.