cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- From: "Mr. Puneet Kishor" <punkish AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:36:23 -0700
On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Anthony <osm AT inbox.org> wrote:
Before you do the above, please be aware of the following: > CC does not assert copyright in the texts of its licenses, so you may modify the license text as you wish. Be aware that if you change the text of any Creative Commons license, however, you must no longer call, label or describe the license a “Creative Commons” or “CC” license. Nor can you use the Creative Commons logos, buttons or other trademarks in connection with the modified license or your work. > We advise against modifying our licenses or the terms that apply to reuse, whether by altering the text itself or indirectly through other means, such as in your terms of service. A modified license very likely will not be compatible with the same CC license (unmodified) applied to other works. This would prevent licensees from using, combining or remixing content under your customized license with content under the same or compatible CC licenses. > Worse, doing so creates friction that confuses users and undermines the key benefits of public, standardized licenses. Central to our licenses is the grant of a standard set of permissions in advance, without requiring users to ask for permission or seek clarification before using the work. This encourages sharing and facilitates reuse, since everyone knows what to expect and the burden of negotiating permissions on a case by case basis is eliminated. Puneet Kishor Policy Coordinator for Science and Data Creative Commons |
-
[cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Greg Grossmeier, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Parker Higgins, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Mr. Puneet Kishor, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Rob Myers, 04/26/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Kim Tucker, 04/28/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.