cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- From: Parker Higgins <parkerhiggins AT gmail.com>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:54:15 -0700
Hi Heather,
By the current definitions, -ND and -SA are in fact mutually exclusive. If the collection you're describing isn't considered "adapted material," (and it almost definitely shouldn't be), then it doesn't trigger the Sharealike provisions. If it IS considered "adapted material," then the ND clause would prohibit it.Thanks,
Parker
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> wrote:
The current license choosers force a choice between NoDerivs and Sharealike. These are not opposites, and there are occasions when it makes sense to include both elements. For example, if an article is published it might be reused as a whole work in a larger work (e.g. a chapter in a book), in which case the author might want both ND and SA.
Could this be addressed in the Version 4.0 license round? I'm not sure if this is a legal matter or a question of how the license chooser is set up.
best,
Heather Morrison
The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
--
parker higgins
san francisco, ca
http://parkerhiggins.net
gmail / gchat: parkerhiggins AT gmail.com
twitter / identi.ca: @xor
please consider software freedom before reading this e-mail on a proprietary platform
-
[cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Greg Grossmeier, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Parker Higgins, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Mr. Puneet Kishor, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Rob Myers, 04/26/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Kim Tucker, 04/28/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.