Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>]

The elements are incompatible.  Under ND you may not prepare a derivative/adaptation.  Under SA you have to license any derivative/adaptation under SA.

In terms of using an article as a whole in a larger work, this is allowed under both ND and SA.  The combined work is a Collection, and does not have to be released under SA.

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> wrote:

The current license choosers force a choice between NoDerivs and Sharealike. These are not opposites, and there are occasions when it makes sense to include both elements. For example, if an article is published it might be reused as a whole work in a larger work (e.g. a chapter in a book), in which case the author might want both ND and SA.

Could this be addressed in the Version 4.0 license round? I'm not sure if this is a legal matter or a question of how the license chooser is set up.

best,

Heather Morrison
The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community