cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
- To: Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca>
- Cc: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:10:52 -0400
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> wrote:
Thanks, Anthony.
What does a creator do if they want to release their work so that it can be included in a collection, but not modified, as long as the collection is under the same license terms?
They release their work with a license which says that the work can be included in a collection, but not modified, as long as the collection is under the same license terms.
No CC license does this. In fact, I'm not aware of any license which does.
It is potentially possible. And CC licenses are themselves CC0, so you could potentially modify CC-ND to do this. You'd definitely have to strip out the parts allowing use as part of a Collection, and add a sentence which says "The work can be included in a Collection, but not modified, as long as the Collection is under the same license terms." You'd probably also have to do something with the permission to copy, because otherwise you might run into problems with the doctrine of first sale. It's probably something you'd want to get legal advice on, if you needed any level of assurance that you were getting it right.
Anthony
-
[cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Greg Grossmeier, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Parker Higgins, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Mr. Puneet Kishor, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Rob Myers, 04/26/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Anthony, 04/04/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 04/04/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Kim Tucker, 04/28/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.