Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca>]

Thanks, Anthony.

What does a creator do if they want to release their work so that it can be 
included in a collection, but not modified, as long as the collection is 
under the same license terms? 

best,

Heather Morrison

On 2013-04-04, at 12:14 PM, Anthony wrote:

> The elements are incompatible.  Under ND you may not prepare a 
> derivative/adaptation.  Under SA you have to license any 
> derivative/adaptation under SA.
> 
> In terms of using an article as a whole in a larger work, this is allowed 
> under both ND and SA.  The combined work is a Collection, and does not have 
> to be released under SA.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> wrote:
> The current license choosers force a choice between NoDerivs and 
> Sharealike. These are not opposites, and there are occasions when it makes 
> sense to include both elements. For example, if an article is published it 
> might be reused as a whole work in a larger work (e.g. a chapter in a 
> book), in which case the author might want both ND and SA.
> 
> Could this be addressed in the Version 4.0 license round? I'm not sure if 
> this is a legal matter or a question of how the license chooser is set up.
> 
> best,
> 
> Heather Morrison
> The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
> http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
> 
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>