cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Gisle Hannemyr <gisle AT ifi.uio.no>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:32:21 +0200
On 16.04.2012 10:43, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Gisle Hannemyr wrote:
>> So I take a few steps back, and try again to explain just *why*
>> I think that section 2(b)(2) "other rights" should be replaced
>> with the following text in CC ver. 4:
>>
>> The Licensor waives the right to collect individual royalties
>> from You. However, where the Licensor has entered into a voluntary
>> agreement with a collecting society that is entitled to collect
>> royalties on behalf of the Licensor, or where there exists a
>> statutory or compulsory licensing scheme (e.g. extended collective
>> licenses) for collecting such royalties, such agreements or
>> licensing schemes are not invalidated by this Public License.
> I don’t know if I understand that correctly.
>
> Does that mean, that if these collectors exists and I don’t pay money to
> them, I am not allowed to use the cc work?
No.
If these collectors exists and you do *not* buy a blanket license
from them, then CC gives you permission to use the work (just
like it does today).
However, if these collectors exists (in your jurisdiction), and
you buy a license from them, then the money you pay for this
license will be have to be paid to *all* the artists that are
entitled to a share the maoney under the blanket license.
Under the current proposal, using CC means to the artists waives
the right to receive any money collected under a non-compulsory
collective license.
--
- gisle hannemyr [ gisle{at}hannemyr.no - http://folk.uio.no/gisle/ ]
========================================================================
"Don't follow leaders // Watch the parkin' meters" - Bob Dylan
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Collecting societies (and PROs)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Collecting societies (and PROs), Diane Peters, 04/25/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Collecting societies (and PROs),
drew Roberts, 04/25/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Collecting societies (and PROs), Gisle Hannemyr, 04/26/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Collecting societies (and PROs), drew Roberts, 04/26/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Gisle Hannemyr, 04/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Ben Finney, 04/10/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC, Francesco Poli, 04/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Gisle Hannemyr, 04/14/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 04/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC, Gisle Hannemyr, 04/20/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Arne Babenhauserheide, 04/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC, drew Roberts, 04/11/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC, jonathon, 04/17/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Ben Finney, 04/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC,
Blaise Alleyne, 04/09/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] PROs [was: Thoughts on NC],
Gisle Hannemyr, 04/10/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] PROs [was: Thoughts on NC],
Diane Peters, 04/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] PROs [was: Thoughts on NC], zotz, 04/16/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] PROs [was: Thoughts on NC],
Diane Peters, 04/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] PROs [was: Thoughts on NC],
Gisle Hannemyr, 04/10/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.