Development of Creative Commons licenses

[adam <adam AT xs4all.nl>]

hi,

There seems a lot of discussion about the derivatives and source 
(especially considering it was an easter holiday these last 3 days in 
many countries). Most comments were in favor but also some not but there 
at least seems to be quite a good level of interest in discussing this 
further.

Is there a way to carry this forward?

adam



On 08/04/12 20:50, zotz AT 100jamz.com wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:42:48 +0200, Francesco Poli
> <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>  wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:18:30 +0200 adam wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/04/12 04:52, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > If I were adam I'd want some form of one-way BY
> > > > and BY-SA compatibility with GPL rather than adding source
> > > > requirements to CC licenses.
> > [...]
> >
> > I am already asking for a one-way conversion clause from CC-by-sa to
> > GPL and from CC-by to zlib.
>
> No. Please. Not if we get proper copyleft protection into BY-SA this
> round for things like photos and images in video etc. I don't think the
> GPL provides this protection and why would we want to negate the
> improvements that we may achieve in BY-SA going forward by letting the
> works slip out into the GPL where they will lose that protection? Now,
> if the next GPL follows the lead of BY-SA going forwards and gives equal
> protection, I am ***ALL*** for joining the silos as this is the one
> painful weakness/problem with strong copyleft versions of Free licenses.
>
> all the best,
>
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
>
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community