Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - [cc-licenses] Distribution of picture on the internet in US-law?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Karl Ebener <myonlyb AT vollbio.de>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [cc-licenses] Distribution of picture on the internet in US-law?
  • Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:59:50 +0200

Hi,

most people should have noticed the discussion about the Virgin Mobile case. I have a question that arose when I read the comments from Lawrence Lessig and the CC Corporation on this topic:

In US law, how is the distribution of pictures of someone over the internet to be treated?

Lessig writes (http://lessig.org/blog/2007/09/on_the_texas_suit_against_virg.html):
"I doubt that any court would find the photographer in this case had violated any right of privacy merely by posting a photograph like this on Flickr."

and CC writes (http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7680):
"So did the photographer violate Ms. Chang’s rights?
We certainly don’t think so. We don’t believe any court should find that Justin Wong had violated Ms. Chang’s rights simply by posting this photo of her in Flickr, however it was licensed. Cool (as in using Flickr, and even better, using Flickr with CC licenses) can’t be a crime."

Is that so in US law (after having read above, I assume so)? And if so: why? Is there any written law/decision(s) on this topic? Or any source where I could look this up?

I ask, because in Germany the right to a picture of you is part of the general moral rights and any distribution is subject to your consent... Thus, in Germany, the question "So did the photographer violate Ms. Chang’s rights?" would most like be answered with "Yes"...

Thank you very much
Karl




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page