Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Lawsuit over Virgin Mobile's and Ethical Use

cc-licenses AT

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anirudh <anirudhsbh AT>
  • To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Lawsuit over Virgin Mobile's and Ethical Use
  • Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:21:20 +0530

"...which would be prejudicial to the
Original Author's honor or reputation...."

Subjective and prone to misuse, IMO.


On 9/28/07, Jordan S Hatcher <jordan AT> wrote:

On 28 Sep 2007, at 18:32, paola.dimaio AT wrote:

> Jordan
> how do you recommedn that can I use a cc license, and prevent usage of
> my work in an unethical context? (whatever defintion of unethical a
> licensor may have)
> I appreciate your advice
> cheers
> P


I guess what I'm saying is that you _don't_ use a cc licence with the
expectation that you stop 'unethical' uses.

So for example, if you don't want the military to use your work,
don't use a CC licence.

You *may, depending on the context and the law in the jurisdiction
where you are trying to enforce the licence, be able to rely on the
right to object to derogatory treatment.

This is in the unported licence (which isn't tuned to ANY
jurisdiction) in 4c.

"You must not distort, mutilate, modify or take other derogatory
action in relation to the Work which would be prejudicial to the
Original Author's honor or reputation."

Note however that this right is present in a wide variety of forms
(from virtually non-existent to strongly enforced) throughout the world.



Mr. Jordan S Hatcher, JD, LLM

jordan at opencontentlawyer dot com
IP/IT Blog:

Usage of Creative Commons by cultural heritage organisations

"The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Information Technology Based

cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page