Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Thursday 03 May 2007 06:53 pm, Kevin Phillips (home) wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "drew Roberts" <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
> To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts"
> <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?
>
snip
>
> http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1490830/20040908/index.jhtml?headlines=tru
>e
>
> "Three judges sitting on the panel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in
> Cincinnati said the same federal laws currently in place to halt music
> piracy will also apply to digital sampling, and explained, "If you cannot
> pirate the whole sound recording, can you 'lift' or 'sample' something less
> than the whole? Our answer to that question is in the negative."

We may be talking about different aspects of this game. I was lastly 
highlighting the interesting twist that the statutory license gives as an 
alternative to the CC licenses for non-dramatic musical works.
>
> Yikes!
>
> Kev

all the best,

drew

-- 
(da idea man)