cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?
- From: Eric Garner <ejgarner AT yahoo.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
> > So alternatively I can license a song under BY or
> >BY-SA and earn nothing
> > (compulsory licenses are waivered), yet other
> >musicians can freely adapt or
> > use my song, go on to resell their spin-offs or
> >remixes without so much as
> > a $1 tip for me.
>
> One thing with BY-SAas opposed to a bare BY, you
> could also turn around and
> freely resell their adaptation or your adaptation of
> their adaptation or your
> remix of their remix or adaptation without so much
> as a $1 tip for them.
>
Yes, SA creates space for a competitive market in lieu
of a structure for royalty payments. If an RIAA label
sold a compilation of BY-SA music on iTunes for $9.99,
you'd be free to sell that same compilation on your
own website for half that amount, thus gaining a price
advantage. Though arrangements are copyright-able, the
label couldn't stop you because their arrangement
would also have to be BY-SA.
But I don't see why this wouldn't be the case if only
the Attribution license was used. This clip from the
legal code for the Attribution license (section
4-Restrictions, part a) says: "You may not offer or
impose any terms on the Work that restrict the terms
of this License or the ability of a recipient of the
Work to exercise the rights granted to that recipient
under the terms of the License.") Doesn't this mean
that the label couldn't impose a standard copyright on
the compilation, or does it only apply to the
individual tracks therein?
-
[cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Jake McKee, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
James Grimmelmann, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Jake McKee, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Kevin Phillips (home), 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
drew Roberts, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Eric Garner, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
drew Roberts, 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, Kevin Phillips (home), 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, drew Roberts, 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, Kevin Phillips (home), 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, drew Roberts, 05/03/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
drew Roberts, 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, Greg London, 05/03/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, drew Roberts, 05/04/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, Greg London, 05/04/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, drew Roberts, 05/04/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?, Terry Hancock, 05/06/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Eric Garner, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
drew Roberts, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Kevin Phillips (home), 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
Jake McKee, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Need clarification: What is "commercial"?,
James Grimmelmann, 05/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.