Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Eric Garner <ejgarner AT yahoo.com>]

--- James Grimmelmann <james AT grimmelmann.net> wrote:
> 
> Question: is this kind of decision something that
> musicians would care
> about propagating through into derivative works?  As
> long as the license
> proliferation can be kept clear of creating new  SA
> hybrids, the
> consequences of multiplying the licenses are less
> severe.
> 
> I'm still generally skeptical of new license
> proposals, but this does
> seem to be an area where license behavior diverges
> strongly from author
> expectations, and there's also a good case against
> simply modifying the
> license that isn't working for them.
> 
> James
> 

In an instance where Joe next door hears an original
song of mine on a pod- or webcast and decides to do a
mashup of it, I would be okay with the resulting song
being 'castable royalty-free. But that's just me. I
suppose this scenario could be addressed through a
combination of the hybrid license you're proposing and
another license, Sampling+ for instance.