Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Is "podsafe" music affected by CRB rulings

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Garner <ejgarner AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Is "podsafe" music affected by CRB rulings
  • Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT)


--- James Grimmelmann <james AT grimmelmann.net> wrote:
>
> Question: is this kind of decision something that
> musicians would care
> about propagating through into derivative works? As
> long as the license
> proliferation can be kept clear of creating new SA
> hybrids, the
> consequences of multiplying the licenses are less
> severe.
>
> I'm still generally skeptical of new license
> proposals, but this does
> seem to be an area where license behavior diverges
> strongly from author
> expectations, and there's also a good case against
> simply modifying the
> license that isn't working for them.
>
> James
>

In an instance where Joe next door hears an original
song of mine on a pod- or webcast and decides to do a
mashup of it, I would be okay with the resulting song
being 'castable royalty-free. But that's just me. I
suppose this scenario could be addressed through a
combination of the hybrid license you're proposing and
another license, Sampling+ for instance.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page