cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo

From: Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:33:11 -0800

On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Jonathon Blake wrote:

[cut]

I don't think many people have thought about the implications of "NC",
especially as laid out in the guidelines of what Creative Commons says
it means. [Which I noticed today have changed since I last looked
them on the wiki, six or so months ago.]

really? how have they changed?

xan

jonathon
-- OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO.
Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed
security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this product
for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you
will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the organization
that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed,
defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards.
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo , (continued)