cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware)
- From: Melissa Cotano <melcotano AT yahoo.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware)
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
This would probably work for the original poster as I assume he is writing the code for the game.
In my case I use a screensaver maker tool that generates the screensavers for me and do not have that flexibility.
-Melissa
drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 04:28 pm, Melissa Cotano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Terry raised a very good point and I would like to know if the folks at
> CreativeCommons.org can help us better understand CC-BY section 4.a.
>
> In my case I am making commercial screensavers and would like to use
> CC-BY 2.0 images. The trick is that the screensavers are to be distributed
> as trialware (like the original poster's game.)
>
> I understand that because the software would expire after a given period
> of time this might infringe on CC-BY section 4.a (the images are embedded
> in the binary.) So what if I also install those images in a separate folder
> on the user's PC. They would also be accessible at anytime.
>
> Would this by comply with the license?
Someone else can try and answer that, but could you do that plus have a menu
option to write out the files from within the program itself and shut down
the rest of the functionality but not that? Would that work for everyone?
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Melissa
all the best,
drew
>
> Terry Hancockwrote: Melissa Cotano wrote:
> > CC-BY section 4.a states that:
> > "You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or
> > publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures
> > that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with
> > the terms of this License Agreement"
> >
> > I would say that trialware "controls access and use of the work"
> > (since after a period of time that work becomes unavailable.) Now
> > what I am not sure is if this is considered to be "a manner
> > inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement."
>
> Yeah, it would be inconsistent with "CC-By" since the license permits
> access indefinitely,
> whereas the trialware shuts down after a period of time (i.e. the
> control prevents access at a time when the license -- CC-By -- would
> still permit access, hence it's inconsistent with the license terms).
>
> The reason why this wouldn't affect the original poster's problem is
> just that the content under the CC-By is separate from the program that
> displays them. So as long as the content remains accessible even after
> the trial has expired, the license on the content is not affected, IMHO.
>
> Cheers,
> Terry
--
(da idea man)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/145261
Record a song and you might win $1,000.00
http://www.ourmedia.org/user/17145
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware,
Melissa Cotano, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware,
Terry Hancock, 10/02/2006
-
[cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
Melissa Cotano, 10/05/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
drew Roberts, 10/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware), Melissa Cotano, 10/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware), Terry Hancock, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
LinuxLala, 10/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware), drew Roberts, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
rob, 10/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware), LinuxLala, 10/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware), Terry Hancock, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
drew Roberts, 10/05/2006
-
[cc-licenses] CreativeCommons.org clarification on CC-BY section 4.a? (was Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware),
Melissa Cotano, 10/05/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility of Attribution license with Trialware,
Terry Hancock, 10/02/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.