Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Garner <ejgarner AT yahoo.com>
  • To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
  • Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:33:09 -0700 (PDT)

Why not break the non-TPA language out of the ND, NC, SA, etc. licenses and make it a completely separate option called "N-TPA" or something like that? This would get the non-TPA language out of the way for Debian's review of all the other licensing options, wouldn't it? It would also make application of the non-TPA language a completely deliberate act on the part of the licensor, thus removing any doubt. Just an idea.
Eric



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page