Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Thursday 06 October 2005 05:40 pm, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> drew Roberts wrote:
> >>><quote>
> >>>   By editing or posting to this wiki, you agree that your contributions
> >>>   will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike
> >>>   2.5 license, and you designate [INSERT WIKI NAME] for attribution.
> >>></quote>
> >>
> >>That sounds good.
> >
> > Does it? Is it possible to get around the license statement that it is
> > the sole agreement this easily? This is an honest question, and not meant
> > to be argumentative.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Get around what?

Here is the heart of my question. I hope I explain it better this time.

8.e. This License constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with 
respect to the Work licensed here.

Is the quote a further agreement between the parties? What agreements can we 
make outside of the license and between whom, which are not negated by 8.e?
>
> The new BY-SA 2.5 allows people to "designate a third party" that can
> receive attribution instead of the author. This was done to make the
> license wiki-friendly. Now I'm trying to figure out what set of words
> will allow me and my friends to use the license in that way.
>
> It'd be great of Creative Commons provided a sample copyright statement
> that people can re-use. Like the GNU people do.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.

all the best,

drew
--
 http://www.ourmedia.org/node/63600
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22