Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Daniel Carrera <daniel.carrera AT zmsl.com>]

drew Roberts wrote:
> > > <quote>
> > >   By editing or posting to this wiki, you agree that your contributions
> > >   will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike
> > >   2.5 license, and you designate [INSERT WIKI NAME] for attribution.
> > > </quote>
> >
> > That sounds good.
>
> Does it? Is it possible to get around the license statement that it is the 
> sole agreement this easily? This is an honest question, and not meant to be 
> argumentative.

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Get around what?

The new BY-SA 2.5 allows people to "designate a third party" that can 
receive attribution instead of the author. This was done to make the 
license wiki-friendly. Now I'm trying to figure out what set of words 
will allow me and my friends to use the license in that way.

It'd be great of Creative Commons provided a sample copyright statement 
that people can re-use. Like the GNU people do.

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
     /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
    /\/_/
   /\/_/   No trees were harmed in the generation of
   \/_/    this email. However, a significant number
   /       of electros were severely inconvenienced.