cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:28:22 -0500
On Monday 28 March 2005 04:11 pm, Greg London wrote:
> drew Roberts said:
> > Do you know of any reason why SA
> > should not cover the same uses as NC?
>
> not sure. my guess is that it came from
> the way GNU copyleft licenses work.
> They allow works to be aggregated
> with non-copyleft works.
Sure, I know how the GPL works, probably better than how the CC stuff works.0
>
> Some specific examples on the GNU website
> say they want their software to be
> distributable on a CD with non-GNU
> licensed works.
>
> The user can then do a local build on
> their machine, combining the copyleft
> stuff with the proprietary stuff.
>
> If you can't aggregate, you'd have
> to use separate CD's.
If it is just a matter of history, CC did not have an issue with NC even
though the GPL would. This would just be another of the spectrum of rights to
keep/give up. Right?
Does anyone know of any substantive reasons why SA should not cover the same
uses as NC?
all the best,
drew
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code
, (continued)
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code,
Greg London, 03/28/2005
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code,
drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code,
Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Glenn Otis Brown, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Glenn Otis Brown, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Greg London, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code,
Greg London, 03/28/2005
-
Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code,
drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Evan Prodromou, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Evan Prodromou, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, drew Roberts, 03/28/2005
- Re: Call for more license options - Creative Commons Legal Code, Mike Linksvayer, 03/28/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.