cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- From: mp <mp AT fsc.cc>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:26:59 +0100
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 23:04, Rob Myers wrote:
> For me personally, Free means GPL-compatible (I know, I know... :-) ).
> Which would be CC-SA, I think. BSD would be CC, wouldn't it?
> By the FSF's "Free Software" definition:
> http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html , I think that licenses with
> NC and ND in would be non-Free.
I am fascinated by the concept of "freedom"... in software the *most
radical view* seems to be that:
Freedom = the lifting of all constraints.
In the work of CC one would assume that the project was to translate the
Freedom of Free Software *as a metaphor*, rather than literally
transposing it unchanged/unchallenged to other domains. For what is Free
exactly?? - in the world of political theory the concept of lifting all
constraints is one of the central elements of the global capital market
forces, sometimes referred to as the laissez-faire aspect of
neo-liberalism. Human rights are constraints, as are the Ten
Commandments.... Is the world ready for Full Freedom beyond software?
I doubt it. My freedom is bound up with yours and with everyone else's,
-- and other parties' Freedom might well impinge upon your capacity to
be *free*... For instance, the pursuit of profit for profit's sake alone
through severe and devastating exploitation, such as exercised by oil
companies etc., -is that something that can be embraced by (or within)
Freedom? - can we be building freedom if our community includes such
actors?
For licenses are about property rights, and property rights are about
social organisation through community building - the Free Software
Community shows this so well.... but for the GPL to be translated beyond
software some critical thinking is needed - mere rhetoric and received
opinion won't get us far, IMHO.
How much damage and greed and violence can Freedom sustain?
Free Software in guided missiles, is that Freedom?
/mp
--
Take control of your informational flow!
Join a community server: http://wiki.aktivix.org
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
, (continued)
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, mp, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.