cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- From: evan AT wikitravel.org
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:54:22 -0700
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:03:07PM +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> >I'd really like to see a source-code license element in future
> >versions of
> >the CC suite.
>
> Wellllll. I'd like to see a GPL-compatible CC license. I'd be very,
> very wary of releasing Yet Another Software License, even one done as
> well as the CC content licenses. There's too many Open Source licenses
> already, and content ain't code (tm).*
I think I was clumsy in using the word "source code". Your definition of
content source -- editable versions of works --- is a better term.
I'd like to see a license element where distributors and creators of
derivative works have to make available editable versions of works.
~ESP
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
, (continued)
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Greg London, 08/17/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Greg London, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, mp, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.