cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?

From: evan AT wikitravel.org
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:50:45 -0700

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:35:44PM +0200, toddd AT mypse.goracer.de wrote:

> Currently, there is not a single free CC 2.0 license.
> They are ALL non-free.

Why do you think that (say) the Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0
licenses are non-free?

> The current CC is a smack in the face of the free software movement...

I think that that's really inaccurate and insulting to the very many people
who've worked very hard to make Creative Commons as successful as it is.

~ESP

Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses? , (continued)