cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- From: evan AT wikitravel.org
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:52:46 -0700
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:46:00PM +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> This means you can easily find the sources, use more of the
> source material and/or alter the source material. There's no such
> requirement for content under CC*, and I do think this is a problem
> with CC compared to GPL.
I'd really like to see a source-code license element in future versions of
the CC suite.
~ESP
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
, (continued)
- Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Greg London, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Greg London, 08/17/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Greg London, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the 'Attribution' option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
James Grimmelmann, 08/17/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, James Grimmelmann, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
evan, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, evan, 08/16/2004
- Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
- what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?, mp, 08/16/2004
-
Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?,
Rob Myers, 08/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.