baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: David Moberg <davidjmoberg AT gmail.com>
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [BL] 2.4 vs. 2.2 (was: /lib/cpp...)
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:16:09 -0800
sindi keesan wrote:
> So, is there any advantage in my case in using Steven's big kernel instead
> of the 2.4.31 customized one, which also does USB?
I cannot see any. Unless you need to use firewalling or a 2.2.26
module for some rare network card, the 2.4.31 kernel should be fine.
> Is there any difference in output if I compile using kernel 2.2.16 with
> SW71 linuxinc kernel headers, or 2.4.31 with kernel-headers from SW10.2?
There will likely be a difference for something kernel-specifc like
cardmgr or insmod. But anything user-level, such as netpbm, or
hello world, or lynx, will be basically the same.
Your libc version will make a much bigger difference.
> Would the later kernel compile programs that the earlier kernel won't,
Possibly. It will definitely allow you to compile more 3rd-part drivers.
> or compile faster or slower?
I would not expect a difference.
David
- [BL] 2.4 vs. 2.2 (was: /lib/cpp...), David Moberg, 01/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.