baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: David Moberg <davidjmoberg AT gmail.com>
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] new release of BL?
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:55:56 -0800
sindi keesan wrote:
> > I have been very happy with the performance/stability of
> > the current busybox (unlike some of the earlier versions).
> > I see no reason to change it (particularly since I no
> > longer have a uClibc partition).
>
> Among other things, they fixed bugs in sed, bunzip, cp, grep, httpd,
> tar and telnet, and shrank init and nc.
I like busybox because they actually try to make newer versions
smaller, not larger.
> Is grep supposed to find things in files beginning with '.'?
With what command line? To find string "clark" in all files in
the current directory:
grep -l "clark" .* *
No, a single * does not include files starting with ., by default.
This isn't grep's fault, it is a feature of your shell (ash/bash).
Use the 'find' command to search subdirectories:
find -exec grep -l "clark" '{}' ';'
This includes all files beginning with '.', but I don't think it
works with busybox find.
> Will you use the latest uclib (Aug 17 2005, 0.9.28) to compile anything
> for the next BL?
I think he is using libc5 for now. I am still using 0.9.27 for compiling,
haven't gotten around to downloading 0.9.28 yet. The uClibc folks
seem to break binary compatibility with every single little release.
David
-
Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?"
, (continued)
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", Stephen Clement, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", David Moberg, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", Stephen Clement, 12/15/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", Stephen Clement, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", sindi keesan, 12/16/2005
- Re: [BL] Busybox 1.01, was " new release of BL?", Stephen Clement, 12/16/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, David Moberg, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, 3aoo-cvfd, 12/14/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/15/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, 3aoo-cvfd, 12/15/2005
- Re: [BL] new release of BL?, sindi keesan, 12/15/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.