b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?
- From: Michael Abernathy <mabernathy AT conwaycorp.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:47:31 -0500
I am a bit double minded on this topic. On the one hand, prior to
the twentieth century most cities were somewhat isolated. I used to
have a document that showed England had about twenty dialects within
twenty miles of London in the 1890's. It is my understanding that
the English language did not come close to being standardized until
we had both a published dictionary and a common Bible. On the other hand, I seem to remember some of the most important trade routes to Egypt connecting with Mesopotamia, Syria, and Phoenicia ran right through Palestine. Greek merchants were actively involved trading in this region early in the first millennium and I seem to remember a study strongly suggesting that Greek mercenaries lived in Jerusalem around the time of David. As I understand it merchants commonly traveled from one village to another buying and selling local goods. I have to consider it likely that they used a common trade language. Earlier Hebrews may have used Egyptian for trade since at least in the Amarna period Egypt controlled much of the area. During the period of the Judges, they dealt with the Moabites, Canaanites, Philistines, Midianites, etc. With this in mind I find it difficult to imagine that Hebrew was ever isolated in any real sense. Sincerely, Michael Abernathy |
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
JimStinehart, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
K Randolph, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
Barry, 04/09/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/10/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/10/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
Barry, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
Michael Abernathy, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
K Randolph, 04/10/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/11/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/11/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
K Randolph, 04/11/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, George Athas, 04/11/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/15/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, George Athas, 04/16/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/17/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, Will Parsons, 04/17/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?, K Randolph, 04/18/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/11/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
K Randolph, 04/10/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
K Randolph, 04/09/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew was linguistically isolated?,
George Athas, 04/09/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.