b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: Philip <philipengman AT yahoo.com>
- Cc: "b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.orglist list" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] KPR
- Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:01:35 -0500
1. My personal opinion is that there is no such thing in Hebrew as "intensification". 2. I believe that the different BINYANIYM are due to different parallel developments of the Hebrew language in variously inserting the personal pronouns I = HIY and U =HU among the radical letters. 3. For historical reasons some verbs tend to appear in one BINYAN rather than another, while some alternate, for instance $IBER = $ABAR of Ex. 9:25. 4. Hebrew has learned to use the different BINYANIYM to enrich the language and create, out of the same root, words of slightly shifted meaning, for instance the $ABAR, 'broke', of Is. 14:5 versus the MA-$BIYR, 'supplier', of Prov. 11:26. 5. It is of some interest that present day Hebrew likes the clarity of the piel form, to wit: TILPEN, 'used the phone', PIXES, 'sent a fax', SIMES, 'sent an sms', GIGEL, 'looked up google', ZIPZEP, 'zipped through web sites'. In present day Hebrew KAPAR is used for 'denied', as in KAPAR BA-A$MAH, 'denied the accusation'. Isaac Fried, Boston University On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Philip wrote: represents intensification. |
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
Philip, 01/02/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] KPR, Isaac Fried, 01/02/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
K Randolph, 01/03/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
Philip, 01/04/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
George Athas, 01/04/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
David Kolinsky, 01/04/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] KPR, George Athas, 01/04/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
David Kolinsky, 01/04/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] KPR, Isaac Fried, 01/05/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
George Athas, 01/04/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] KPR,
Philip, 01/04/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.