b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:15:54 -0500
The claim of "gemination" is, in my opinion, a mere phantasy. Doubling a letter that is written only once amounts, I am afraid, to a heedless distortion of the biblical text.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Rolf Furuli wrote:
You are correct when you say that most Semitists view WAYYIQTOL as perfective. But I would ask two questions on the basis of the masoretic rules of pointing and vocalization: Could the gemination of the YOD in the prefix and the position of the stress corroborate the view that the WAY(Y)-prefix only is a conjunction that have a conjunctive force, and not is a semantic marker making WAYYIQTOL different from YIQTOL?
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect
, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/09/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/07/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Randall Buth, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
K Randolph, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, K Randolph, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Randall Buth, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Rolf Furuli, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
James Spinti, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
James Spinti, 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Barry H., 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect, Barry H., 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
James Spinti, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
James Spinti, 02/08/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] no to aspect,
Isaac Fried, 02/08/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.