b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew List <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] RB
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:46:36 -0400
1. What is this "etymological error"?
2. What are the "other possible meanings"? Is there, actually, only a finite number of "other possible meanings"?
3. What is this "evidence" against this two-letter root?
4. How can it not be a root when it is a root?
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:38 PM, K Randolph wrote:
Jim:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:49 AM, <JimStinehart AT aol.com> wrote:
1. RB is an archaic 2-consonant root that means “to be big; …
This whole article fails because it is based on an etymological error, there
are other possible meanings, even when accepting your presupposition against
all evidence that this is a two letter root. And the evidence is that this
is not a two letter root.
Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] RB,
JimStinehart, 11/04/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] RB,
K Randolph, 11/04/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, Isaac Fried, 11/04/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, George Athas, 11/04/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] RB,
kenneth greifer, 11/05/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, Steve Miller, 11/05/2010
-
[b-hebrew] RB,
kenneth greifer, 11/05/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, George Athas, 11/05/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] RB,
JimStinehart, 11/05/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, K Randolph, 11/08/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] RB,
JimStinehart, 11/08/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, George Athas, 11/08/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] RB, JimStinehart, 11/09/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] RB,
K Randolph, 11/04/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.