b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Doug Belot" <dbelot AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: "George Athas" <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>, "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:21:24 +1000
Hi George , I note here that you write , Yahweh , that suggests to me you believe that Yahweh is the correct name of the LORD of the OT, as shown in the following ,
Ps 148:13 Let us praise the name of the LORD , for His name alone is exalted
His glory is above the earth and heaven.
Ps 44:8 And praise Your name forever .
Ps 86:12 I will praise you O LORD My God with all my heart.
And I will glorify Your name forever more.
Would that mean you would glorify Yahweh, "His name alone" forever more.
Doug Belot
----- Original Message ----- From: "George Athas" <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
To: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew
No Fred, your analysis is a little too narrow. The word רע has a very broad semantic range. The best word that captures it in English (if you can possibly capture it in a single word) is ‘bad’. In some instances it conveys the sense of a disaster, misfortune, ugliness, or just plain not nice. Take Gen 41.20, for instance. It’s not making a moral statement about cows. It’s just saying that the cows were in ‘bad’ shape. On other occasions, however, it does appear to involve a moral quality and, as such, could be rendered ‘evil’ (eg. Gen 6.5).
You seem to be committing the common fallacy of totality transfer: taking one meaning within a semantic range and applying it across the board to all instances of a particular word.
Isa 45.7 has to be taken within context. Since שׁלום doesn’t always have a moral quality to it, I don’t think we must demand that רע (it’s parallel opposite) should either. In the context, it is a statement that Yahweh controls the forces that affect human life. I don’t think it’s a philosophical statement about the origin of evil. I can see how you might take it that way, but in my opinion that divorces it from the surrounding context and, as the old saying goes, if you take a text out of context, you’re left with a con.
GEORGE ATHAS
Moore Theological College (Sydney, Australia)
www.moore.edu.au
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.864 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3221 - Release Date: 10/27/10 04:34:00
-
Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/27/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, George Athas, 10/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, George Athas, 10/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/29/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, K Randolph, 10/29/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/29/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, K Randolph, 10/30/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/30/2010
- [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew - THREAD CLOSED, George Athas, 10/31/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, Doug Belot, 10/27/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum hebrew, George Athas, 10/27/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] quantum Hebrew, fred burlingame, 10/22/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.