Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Biblical Hebrew

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk>
  • To: Oun Kwon <kwonbbl AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Biblical Hebrew
  • Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:42:31 +0100

An analysis of the Greek translation does give some insight into how ehyeh asher ehyeh was understood:

καὶ εἶπεν ὁ θεὸς πρὸς *μωυσῆν ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν καὶ εἶπεν οὕτως ἐρεῖς τοῖς υἱοῖς Iσραηλ ὁ ὢν ἀπέσταλκέν με πρὸς ὑμᾶς

I don't know if that will render but it does show that the first ehyeh is translated as a self introduction i.e. 'I am ...'. While the second is translated as a name after the introduction. This is simple to see because further down 'ho wn' is repeated further down as the name when he says 'ho wn sent me to you'. The sense seems to be of perpetual being in some way and is reminiscent of 'the one that was, the one that is and the one that will be'.

I won't go any further because it's hard to keep the discussion related to b-hebrew.

James Christian


Quoting Oun Kwon <kwonbbl AT gmail.com>:

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:35 AM, James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

I can see your reasoning here Doug but there are many complications it poses:

Firstly, you assume nobody to be familiar with the name of YHWH in
that time. There are lots of indications that this is not correct.
Older manuscripts of the LXX still have YHWH in hebrew characters were
newer versions have KS or kyrios in Greek script. A lot of reforms and
standardisations happened in Constantines day and a lot of MSS were
lost in and as a result of this period.

I won't go into the second point because I'll be going too far out of
the boudaries of b-hebrew discussion. Write to me off list if you wish.

<clipped>

James Christian


I'm not sure how exact the boundaries are. Be that it may, I did learn
from Doug-Harold exchange. It would certainly give a seed for further
study and contemplation, etc.

Yes, many complications it poses. However, it ALL depends on how
others respond and answer the question Doug asked straight.

If I may put something about 'name' from a lay: In the expression
'saved in the name', the 'name' does not refer to a name that which
can be spelled or pronounced or invoked, or etymologized, but, as
Harold said, it refers to what the name stands for. [This goes for
also those occurrences in N.T.]

If I may go just one ounce more; 'ehyeh in Exo 3:14 may give some
confusion by traditional translations, because, as I understand, the
first one is copulative while the second is existential verb 'be'.
Speaking of Greek expression EGW EIMI may not be superimposed on the
Hebrew precisely, because the latter is 'I'm', while the former is 'I
(emphatic) am'. And the second one is hO WN. (Cf. LXX EGW EIMI hO WN.)

Please correct me, if any.

Oun Kwon.





--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page