Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] How does biblical Hebrew describe a present event?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] How does biblical Hebrew describe a present event?
  • Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:58:04 +0200

Dear Karl,

Last year, a student of mine completed the thesis, "The Temporal Reference of Verbs in Direct Speech in Classical Hebrew" for his MA degree. His corpus consisted of Genesis, 1, 2 Samuel, the Minor Prophets, and several Psalms.

He gave a thorough discussion of the problems of identifying "direct speech," and he was careful to include only passages that met his criteria for direct speech.

Below I give some of his statistics for present reference for the participle (P) and for QATAL (Q). The the numbers indicate the percentage of the participle and Qatal of all the verbs with present reference in a particular book:

Genesis: P 33.7% Q 41.6%
1 Samuel: P 37.9% Q 28.2%
2 Samuel: P 27.7% Q 49.2%
Minor Prophets, narrative contexts P 58.3% Q 25.0%
Minor prophets, prophetic speech contexts: P 15.4% Q 46.2%
Psalms, direct speech: P 0% Q 41%
Psalms, poetic speech: P 5.2% Q 41.1%

From this statistics (and I have nothing to do with his numbers, I only was his mentor) we see that QATALs with present reference in direct speech are just as numerous as the participle.

I would like to mention that the committee for the evaluation of this thesis was the professors Steven Fassberg, the Hebrew University, and Bo Isaksson from the University of Stockholm, both being very experienced Hebrew scholars. If there had been basic flaws in the arguments or the statistics, they would have detected that. But their judgement was that the thesis was a very good work. So clearly, the participle is not THE Hebrew form for present reference.


Best regards,

Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo





Rolf:

I wonder how many present referent conversations were recorded in Tanakh?

Genesis 3 records one (the second conversation is all past and future
references):

Verse 2: "we eat" Yiqtol.

Verse 5: "God knows" Qatal, "knowing" participle future referent.

Genesis 4:7 RBC could either be a Qatal or a participle, though it is
a present referent, we cannot know for certain its form.

(A question just occurred to me, how many of those verses that we
presently take as participles, may have been Qatals instead?)

Genesis 4:9 "I don't know" Qatal present, followed by a participle
used as a noun.

Genesis 19:13 M$XTYM if used as a participle is a future referent, if
as a noun can be present.

Genesis 22:12 "I know" Qatal present.

Genesis 29:5 "we know" Qatal present.

I don't have time right now to continue, but the picture so far shows
that the present is not necessarily indicated by the noun/pronoun with
a participle, rather that the Qatal is widely used. and where we have
a noun/pronoun with a participle it is not necessarily a present. In
other contexts, the present is often referenced with a Yiqtol.
Therefore, my conclusion based on what I have seen so far is that the
present is not grammaticalized with a noun/pronoun with participle
structure.

To be complete, we would need to track down all recorded conversations
and analyze them, but in the incomplete survey so far, it seems as if
the Qatal is used more often than the participle as the verb denoting
a present reference.

Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page