Biblical Hebrew Forum

[K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>]

James:

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:18 AM, James Read <J.Read-2 AT sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> I think the summary below makes it quite clear what theory I am talking
> about. For your benefit I cut and paste below:
>
>  You hypothesised something on the lines of the TLDTHs being formulas of
>>> title and author. You later revised it said that author is not always
>>> necessary.
>>>
>>> Later you made the claim that final account in Genesis was a story about
>>> Joseph with no further significance and so had nothing to do with the
>>> lineage of Jacob such that the understanding 'History of Jacob' couldn't
>>> be
>>> a title for the last section of Genesis.
>>>
>>
> So, please, I know you are very good at sidestepping. I don't need any
> further demonstrations. Just, please, either answer the question or let's
> think about something else more productive we can debate about.
>

By your cutting and pasting, and it is of your theory which you made up, not
mine; I’m not going to debate your theory. You have given me one straw man
too many (the straw that broke the camel’s back).

Karl W. Randolph.

>
>
> James Christian
>
>
> Quoting K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>:
>
>  James:
>> You still didn’t answer my question: “Which hypothesis? The one you just
>> made up here, or the one originally posited in this forum?”
>>
>> I will go to your next point when you answer this one.
>>
>> Karl W. Randolph.
>>
>>