b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: <pporta AT oham.net>
- To: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>, "hebrew list" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:05:39 +0200
On 9/6/07, Pere Porta wrote:YS - > Yes, you are right, almost.
>> > In YWOD"(A (Rt 3:11), it is clear that Y is root consonant.
>> > But, what about YWCAR, third word in Isa 54:17?
>> > Is here the yod a root consonant -or radical- too?
>> > This question is intended not as a byzantine one but in order to >> > make
>> > clear where to put this type of word (YWCAR) in the Hebrew >> > Schemary.
>
YS -- Yes, it is.
PP - Are you quite sure that the yod in YWCAR is a root consonant, namely
the first consonant of the basic YFCAR?
I'm not.
Maybe you will ask: And why not?
In Lev 20:10 (YWMAT) and Isa 28:27 (YWDA$) we have to paralel or analogous
verb forms (Huph'al imperfective, 3rd person singular) where initial YW is,
to my sense, clearly a prefix and by no means belonging to the root. So, why
would the yod/yud in YW of YWCAR be the same consonant we find in the basic
YFCAR (Is 44:10)?
Is 54:17 ywcr is 3ms imperfect so that y is not a root letter. I
think the w may
originally have been a root letter I think it's not likely. The verb
form is a Qal
passive. The verb type is a weak verb with initial y.
PP - In the tools I have at hand I read ywcr is a Hoph'al imperfect form. I ask: What is the difference between Hophal and Qal passive? Is Qal passive a regular or consistent conjugation?
Lev 20:10 is not comparable. It is 3ms imperfect Hophal. The verb type is
a weak verb with medial w (and this is why it's not comparable).
Why would they not be comparable? The inner structure of ywcr (Is 54:17) and of ywmt (Lev 20:10), of ywd$ (Is 28:27) and of ywsb (Is 28:27) is, to my sense, QUITE THE SAME. Even if the verb type where these words are built from is not the same.
YS > Is 28:27 ywd$ is 3ms imperfect Qal of a medial w weak verb:
PP - I do not understand. Why ywd$ (Is 28:27) would be 3ms imperfect Qal while ywmt (Lev 20:10) would be 3ms imperfect Hophal?
Pere Porta
Barcelona (Spain)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 09/01/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Yitzhak Sapir, 09/02/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Isaac Fried, 09/01/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
joel, 09/03/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Isaac Fried, 09/04/2007
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 09/06/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?,
pporta, 09/06/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?, Yitzhak Sapir, 09/06/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?, pporta, 09/07/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?, Yitzhak Sapir, 09/07/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?,
pporta, 09/06/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is it root consonant?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 09/06/2007
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Isaac Fried, 09/04/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?,
Yitzhak Sapir, 09/04/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Yitzhak Sapir, 09/05/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Dr Raoul Comninos, 09/04/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Was Schewa really silent?, Isaac Fried, 09/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.