b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Ha'satan - (Sub-category of "New or Renewed in Jeremiah 31:31?")
- From: "Yohanan bin-Dawidh" <yohanan.bin.dawidh AT gmail.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ha'satan - (Sub-category of "New or Renewed in Jeremiah 31:31?")
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:05:25 -0500
Shavu'a Tov Shoshanna,
I will make sure to transliterate for you next time, or merely e-mail you
the references. Our idea on what angels are, and the fact that they cease to
exist when their job is finished is similar; however, I disagree with the
concept that HaSatan's job is to tempt man away from obedience to G-d. It
think that HaSatan is more so the anger of Y___ , which is kindled against
those who have already sinned against Y___.
The only reference to the idea that you present that I find within the
Miq'ra is in Sefer Iyyov, but even here Iyyov credits his ills, and etc. to
Y___.
Yohanan bin-Dawidh
On 4/14/07, Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net> wrote:
�&���dr��z{k��&����mt�v�N�z۫��,{���'q��''z�ή("��S��^n���+-�&�nX���zX�z��N��y���X��ț��b���E���~�&����w'rw�����w'rw��N�睸�[�X��ț��b���>�-~,p��DH�ω��ク
Dear Yochanan, my email program is not configured to read Hebrew, so
most of this email is lost on me, in the future, just send me the
references to the quotes, or transliterate for me, please.
So I don't know if we agree or dsagree that HaSatan is an angel who
has a job to do, as each angel does, when their job(s) are done, they
cease to exist, and HaSatan's job is to tempt man away from obedience
to G-d, in order that man has an opportunity to choose G-d, and
thereby elevate his soul.
Anyway, when Mashiach comes, there will be no more need for this
"testing" (and HaSatan will cease to exist because his job will be
finished, that is what happens to angels), that is what the "new"
covenant refers to.
Shoshanna
>Dear Shoshanna,
>
>In Sefer Bamidbar (Numbers) chapter 22 verse 22 we read
>×ï÷…×ô÷º÷¥×ó÷…×(r)-×ê÷…×£
>×ê÷±×ú÷¼×î÷¥×ô×ù, ×õ÷º÷¥×ô-×î×ï÷¼×ú÷µ×ö÷ƒ ×î×ï÷º×ê,
>×ï÷…×ô÷º÷¥×÷ƒ×ô÷…׶÷º÷µ×ë ×û÷…×ú÷ƒ×ê÷…×ö÷ƒ ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î
>×ë÷º÷…×ì÷º÷×(r)÷×ö÷ƒ,
>×ú÷ƒ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü ×ú×ï÷¼; ×ï÷ƒ×î×ï÷º×ê ×(r)÷¼×õ÷µ×ë
>×¢÷…×ú-×ê÷¾×÷¼×Ý×ï÷¼, ×ï÷º×(c)×Å÷ƒ×Ý÷µ×ô ×Ý÷ƒ×¢÷½×(r)÷½×ô×ï
>×¢÷¥×û÷º×ï÷¼ which
>suggests that in this situation it was ×û÷…×ú÷ƒ×ê÷…×ö÷ƒ
>×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î acting as ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü,
>right? Then in Sefer Shemu'el Alef (1 Samuel) 16:14 we read
>×ï÷º×ë÷¥×¢÷¾×÷…×÷º×ï÷º ×(r)×ï÷º×ó÷…-×(r)÷½×¢÷½×î,
>×û÷µ×ê÷µ× ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î that clearly denotes that an "evil spirit
>from YHWH" terrified
>Sha'ul, and not merely "an evil spirit". Also in Sefer Divrei Hayammim
Alef
>(1 Chronicles) 21:1 we read ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷…×¢÷¾×û÷¼×ì ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü,
>×¢÷…×ú-×ô÷¥×(c)×Ç÷ƒ×(r)÷½×ê÷µ×ú; ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷½×°÷×,
>×ê÷×-×ì÷º÷½×ï÷¥×ô×ì, ×ú÷¥×û÷ƒ×Ý×ï÷¼×, ×ê÷×-×ô÷¥×(c)×Ç÷ƒ×(r)÷½×ê÷µ×ú
>but in the same account in Sefer
>Shemu'el Bet (2 Samuel) 24:1 we read ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷¼×°÷×£,
>×ê÷…×£-×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î, ×ú÷…×ó÷¾×(r)×ï÷¼×,
>×ë÷º÷ƒ×ô÷¥×(c)×Ç÷ƒ×(r)÷½×ê÷µ×ú; ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷½×°÷× ×ê÷×-×ì÷º÷½×ï÷¥×ì
>×ë÷º÷½×î÷×ù ×ú÷µ×ê×û÷¼×(r), ×ú÷µ×ö÷ƒ ×û÷ƒ×Ý÷µ×î
>×ê÷×-×ô÷¥×(c)×Ç÷ƒ×(r)÷½×ê÷µ×ú
>×ï÷ƒ×ê÷×-×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷º×ì÷½×î , suggesting that the ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü of
>the account in Divrei
>Hayammim is ×ê÷…×£-×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î, much like it was in Sefer Bamidbar
>chapter 22.
>
>All the above seem to point to ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü being a servant of
>×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î working on
>His side against "evil men". So what else does the Miq'ra state about the
>concept, or personality of ×(c)×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü?
>
>We read in Sefer Zekaryah chapter 3 ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷…×(r)÷ƒ×ê÷µ×Ý÷¥×ô,
>×ê÷×-×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷¼×(c)×Å÷ª×¢÷… ×î÷…×õ÷º÷¼×î÷µ×ü
>×î÷…×í÷º÷½×ì×ï÷¼×ú, ×¢÷¼×û÷µ×ì, ×ú÷¥×§÷ƒ×Ý÷µ×ô ×û÷…×ú÷ƒ×ê÷…×ö÷ƒ
>×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î; ×ï÷ƒ×î÷…×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü ×¢÷¼×û÷µ×ì
>×¢÷…×ú-×ô÷ƒ×û÷¥×ô×Ý×ï÷¼,
>×ú÷ƒ×(c)×Ç÷¥×ò÷ƒ×Ý×ï÷¼ and then ×ï÷…×ô÷º÷¼×ê×û÷×(r) ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î
>×ê÷×ú-×î÷…×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü, ×ô÷¥×í÷ƒ×¢÷…×(r) ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î ×ë÷º÷ƒ×ö÷½
>×î÷…×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü, ×ï÷ƒ×ô÷¥×í÷ƒ×¢÷…×(r) ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î ×ë÷º÷ƒ×ö÷½,
>×î÷…×ë÷º÷¼×ó÷µ×(r) ×ë÷º÷¥×ô×(r)×ï÷º×(c)×Å÷½×ú÷½÷¥×ù; ×î÷¾×ú×ï÷¼×ê ×ñ÷×î
>×ê×ï÷º×ì,
>×û÷ª×¶÷º÷½×ú ×û÷µ×ê÷µ×(c)×Å which to some would appear as if
>×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü is the enemy of ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î,
>or at least opposes Him, but in truth the answer lies in the phrase
>×ï÷¥×ô×î×ï÷¼×(c)×Å÷ª×¢÷…,
>×î÷½×ô÷½×î ×ú÷½×ë÷ª×(c)×Å ×ë÷º÷ƒ×í÷½×ì÷¥×ô×ù ׶×ï÷¼×ê÷¥×ô×ù;
>×ï÷ƒ×¢÷¼×û÷µ×ì, ×ú÷¥×§÷ƒ×Ý÷µ×ô ×î÷…×û÷º÷…×ú÷ƒ×ê÷½×ö÷ƒ, which when
>linked with the idea of ×ï÷…×Ý÷º÷ƒ×î÷¥×ô ×õ÷…×ò÷º÷½×û÷µ×ê
>×õ÷º÷ª×ú÷º÷½×Ý×ï÷º, ×ï÷º×õ÷ƒ×ë÷×í÷×ì ×¢÷¥×ì÷º÷¥×ô×ù
>×õ÷º÷½×ú-׶÷¥×ì÷ƒ×ß÷¼×÷µ×ô×Ý×ï÷º; ×ï÷…×Ý÷º÷½×ë÷×ú ×õ÷º÷×¢÷½×ú÷×î
>×õ÷º÷ª×ú÷º÷½×Ý×ï÷º, ×ï÷…×¢÷¾×ï'Äç÷¼×Ý÷µ×Ý×ï÷º ×õ÷º÷½×(r)×ï÷º×ó÷…
>×ô÷¥×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ê÷ª×Ý×ï÷º found in Sefer Yishayahu (Isaiah) chapter 64
>verse 5 seem to
>show us that either Israel or Yohoshu'a had sinned.
>
>And what about in Sefer Iyyov (Job) where it appears that ×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü
is
>tempting Iyyov? Through out this text we see everything attributed to
>×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×îby Iyyov, and never to the idea of a
>×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü, and we see that when the ×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü is talking
>to ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î that it is
>made clear that the ×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü can do nothing without the
>permission of ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î,
>right?
>
>I think it is self-evident in the Miq'ra that the idea of
>×(c)÷º×Ç÷½×ò÷½×ü is one of
>a messenger of ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î, or ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î, Himself, acting as an
>advesary to wicked
>humans, or a test unto humans to see if they will remain loyal to
>×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î,
>never as an evil-being in opposition to ×ô÷ƒ×î×ï÷½×î and out to bring
down the
>fall of humankind, which in my humble opinion is a pagan idea.
>
>Yohanan bin-Dawidh×ô÷ƒ
>_______________________________________________
>b-hebrew mailing list
>b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Mt~�ۅ��{ b��"n&劊+�&�׀)�m4�mt�4�M
4^q�y��n��_8��l�M��N=�''�r��z{k���7��8�zz0��ܝ�B�w���pz,�nxE�Z���D�L�Ӂ7�]��g譸^n���+-�&�nX���j�x���N��N��N4�@�2)�U�슉��t�����d���drw'z�h�z���G'rw�1�,j�v�8�]5�W6����sn��_8�`ڵ䚷^ ���ӽ�Ӯ;Ӎ4N��y���X��ț��b����&J,���if����ǰjY�w���rw�
��z{Sʗ�{�V���Z�ǭ
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ha'satan - (Sub-category of "New or Renewed in Jeremiah 31:31?"),
Yohanan bin-Dawidh, 04/14/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ha'satan - (Sub-category of "New or Renewed in Jeremiah 31:31?"),
davidfentonism, 04/15/2007
-
[b-hebrew] New or Renwed - END OF THREAD,
Yigal Levin, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] New or Renwed - END OF THREAD,
Peter Kirk, 04/16/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] New or Renwed - END OF THREAD, Yitzhak Sapir, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] New or Renwed - END OF THREAD,
Peter Kirk, 04/16/2007
-
[b-hebrew] New or Renwed - END OF THREAD,
Yigal Levin, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Ha'satan - (Sub-category of "New or Renewed in Jeremiah 31:31?"),
davidfentonism, 04/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.