Biblical Hebrew Forum

[David Kummerow <farmerjoeblo AT hotmail.com>]

I wrote:
> Rolf, I have not attempted to brush them aside. Regarding qatal, I have 
> sought to give an indication how a tense-prominent position is not 
> incompatible with non-past uses. Time and again, I have sought to 
> interact with your ideas, whereas I see exceedingly little from you. You 
> brush my arguments aside by saying I have brushed things aside! Yet you 
> are doing this repeatedly yourself! Again, you have failed to interact 
> with what I have said. Further, I sought to question your methodology in 
> that I have doubts, as Peter raised also, as to whether it is able to
>
> [snip]

Seems like I ran out of steam - and indeed I am! I'm think I'm nearly 
about to give up on this thread.

However, here's the rest of the last sentence:

"... decide between linguistic convention and semantics if the two are 
separate as you claim."

Regards,
David Kummerow,